IF THEY HAVE SWORN AFFIDAVITS, WHY DIDN'T HE SUE HIS ACCUSERS INSTEAD? HMMM...
Georgia Straight editor defends decision to publish Furlong storyhttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/bri ... cmpid=rss1"On Friday, Georgia Straight editor Charlie Smith defended the paper’s decision to run the story. 'Do people have the right to be heard who swear affidavits about what happened? That’s what it was all about,' Mr. Smith. said."ACCORDING TO APPLE, EROTIC AUTHOR "LACEY NOONAN" (THE TARGET OF A CONTENTIOUS LAWSUIT) IS REALLY A MAN
'Gronking to Remember' Lawsuit Reveals Some Shockershttp://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-es ... ome-803464
"Shocker #1: The author of this erotica novella is a man. Even those reporters who did Q&As (here, here) with 'Lacey Noonan' assumed the author was a she. According to Apple's papers, though, the book was written by Greg McKenna and if there's still any doubt, the computer giant identifies him as a 'Mr.'""WHY CAN'T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?" - Rodney King
Egypt editor quits after publication of anti-Christian pamphlet http://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/blog/2 ... KgpRj.dpuf"The Egyptian Union for Human Rights recently filed a complaint against Omara for 'disturbing the peace and damaging Muslim Christian relations' for a pamphlet titled The Failure of Christianity in the Middle East, which was distributed in last month's issue."SHE SPENT $150K DEFENDING HERSELF AGAINST A LAWSUIT THAT HE LATER DROPPED
Journalist cites financial, physical loss as defamation trial against Vancouver Games CEO beginshttp://news.nationalpost.com/news/canad ... z3e0Vb7XcK"Freelance journalist Laura Robinson investigates claims of discrimination, abuse and racism in sport, and writes stories which 'the establishment does not want to hear, but need to be told,' says her lawyer, prominent Vancouver litigator Bryan Baynham."AUSTRALIA TO START BLOCKING WEBSITES THAT CONTAIN COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
Australia Passes Contentious Online Infringement Billhttp://www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news ... ement-bill“'These offshore sites are not operated by noble spirits fighting for the freedom of the Internet, they are run by criminals who profit from stealing other people’s creative endeavours,' Freudenstein said."JUST BECAUSE IT'S ON THE INTERNET DOESN'T MEAN PEOPLE CAN USE IT FOR FREE!
Hollywood, Tumblr Weigh In on Copyright Dispute Over Paparazzi Photoshttp://www.billboard.com/articles/busin ... zzi-photos"Mavrix skipped past a DMCA takedown notice to sue LiveJournal for infringement based on the actions of its users."